Victory for Lib-Tory
Following weeks of anticipation and days of confusion, conversation and coalition, we now have a stable government (at least for the time being!), lead by the Tories' David Cameron, aided by Nick Clegg and his cohorts of Liberals. A theoretical look at this partnership would suggest the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives will struggle to work alongside one another. However, on reflection, there may be areas where the two parties have similar ideas. We took a short look at the impact of the alliance for students, graduates and young professionals over the next few years.
Whichever way the situation is looked at, the end point is clear – the Lib Dems are going to have a big part to play in our immediate future. Following Gordon Brown's resignation, and the host of new "Tony Blairs" looking to become the next Labour leader (including the Miliband Brothers), the Lib Dems are still taking all the headlines when it comes to the government for the next five years. Nick Clegg will not become Prime Minister, but his position as leader of the Lib Dems and junior partner within the alliance means that in many areas of the economy, he will have an important say with regards to policy. The Lib Dems' own views on education seem to differ somewhat to the views of the Conservative Party, with a clear focus on scrapping the 50% at university scheme initiated by the Labour party a few years ago. They have set a clear precedence to reallocate public spending from universities to apprenticeships, internships and other non-traditional methods of education. This could lead to a range of scenarios; however, we can be pretty sure that funding to universities will drop, leading to our academic institutions needing to raise finances from other areas. If the Lib Dems do have a say in the fees issue, then expect final year fees to be abolished, and a change in the way in which students are funded.
An agreement over education is going to be complex, as Labour and the Tories' policies seem to have more in common with each other than they do with Nick's team. Both seem to be focused on increasing the number of university graduates. This will certainly fit well with the universities, whose 'more-bums-on-seats' policy can only lead to further funding for universities themselves. And whilst the Tories will also focus on apprenticeships and the like, their determination to increase university places will certainly put them at odds with the Lib Dems. Political ideology is still at the forefront of policy making, with the Tories offering incentives for early repayment of students' loans.
An agreement over education is going to be complex, as Labour and the Tories' policies seem to have more in common with each other than they do with Nick's team. Both seem to be focused on increasing the number of university graduates. This will certainly fit well with the universities, whose 'more-bums-on-seats' policy can only lead to further funding for universities themselves. And whilst the Tories will also focus on apprenticeships and the like, their determination to increase university places will certainly put them at odds with the Lib Dems. Political ideology is still at the forefront of policy making, with the Tories offering incentives for early repayment of students' loans.
The other area of significant interest for students and young professionals will be the job market. Conservatives' focus will always be on lower taxes, a policy which is one of the common ideas between the coalition. They both have a clear initiative to encourage the economy to grow through natural forces, with a reduction in "red tape and bureaucracy" to allow businesses to help refuel the economy, and thus create a new jobs market.
However, one area all can be certain of is the increase in funding for (and, dare I say it, reliance on) enterprises. It seems as if new SMEs (small and medium enterprises) will be looked upon to create wealth and jobs for our recovering economy, and the parties are certainly looking to ensure that the new generation of Alan Sugars, Theo Paphitis' and Richard Bransons pull us through by heavily supporting new firms. So if you want a guaranteed job for the next five years, you may want to seriously consider branching out on your own.
Vinay Trivedi
Vinay Trivedi

15 Comments:
Before people jump to conclusions and assume I'm a millionaire aristocrat, I'm not. I come from a working class family and have full loans to pay for my university education.
University free? Not in this economic climate. Sure, when we reach full employment and we cut the wasteful spending, I'm all for it.
Debts of £thousands are nothing compared to the extra money (the vast majority of) people earn from having a degree.
It's an investment, not a free ride. You want to get a good job? Why aren't you willing to pay for it, when it'll massively benefit you?
I don't like the idea of my parents paying for your university degree, and everybody else's parents, because you feel that you're entitled to get it all for free.
Before people jump to conclusions and assume I'm a millionaire aristocrat, I'm not. I come from a working class family and have full loans to pay for my university education.
University free? Not in this economic climate. Sure, when we reach full employment and we cut the wasteful spending, I'm all for it.
Debts of £thousands are nothing compared to the extra money (the vast majority of) people earn from having a degree.
It's an investment, not a free ride. You want to get a good job? Why aren't you willing to pay for it, when it'll massively benefit you?
I don't like the idea of my parents paying for your university degree, and everybody else's parents, because you feel that you're entitled to get it all for free.
Its a coalition not a Lib dem government. The lib dems have got a hell of a lot out of this deal, if they could have got tuition fees as well I'm sure they would have.
If enough people voted for the Lib Dems, and they were elected, then yes.. they probably would have phased out tuition fees.
But facts are - people didn't. So we have a conservative led policy.
They have managed to get an awful lot of liberal weighting in the government. The only people that really betrayed anyone, are the people that supported the Lib Dems by shouting about them, but didn't vote for them in the election.
Lets face it. With the countrys current deficit and amount of money it owes, the idea of scrapping tuition fees is a complete non starter.
Thank you new labour. Not only did you bring in tuition fees, you also have prevented us from taking them away.
I'm hoping so much that Lib Dems vote against an increase in tuition fees.
Lid dem voters are idiots. End of. Even if they managed to get a majority do you really think they would abolish them? God no...... in 6 years time we would have had a different government or the economy would have gone so messed up that they wouldnt be able to afford it anyway.
Bloody liberal students. This is real life, not the utopia you seem to think exists just around the corner.
NUS are useless as well.
God sometimes I just loathe the NUS so much.
This is not a Liberal Democrat majority government. If it was then fine, be angry, but it's not and their promise on tuition fees was dropped even before the election.
So many students want something for nothing it's bloody ridiculous.
University isn't meant to be free. It's a privilege, not a right. At the end of the day, what difference does £9000 extra (or more if you do a longer course) on your student loan make when you're going to be paying back at least another £15,000 anyway?
No its not.
The reason its being looked at is because the current system is unsustainable in the long run, the government is having to shell out stacks of money every year to cover these loans, and it only gets the money back in drips and drabs until the graduates start earning good money, so the net expense every year to the government is huge. Whilst this is a fair system for students, its one of the reasons why the national debt has been rising and why Labour were criticised for excessive spending.
So if they are looking at how to get this unsustainable bill under control, its not going to help by just saying universities can charge higher fees, and the government will increase the amount of the loan to cover it...that will just increase the cost to the government. The idea of lifting the fee cap is to allow universities to raise money privately rather than getting government funding, the extra money will come from students/parents, rather than government.
Quite a lot. An extra £9000 will take years longer to pay off. It will be chipping away at graduate incomes for far longer and affect their ability to get on the housing ladder etc. That said, I recognise the need for tuition fees to exist but the system of loans and grants needs immediate attention- there is one area in particular where waste could be cut and/or funds allocated more appropriately. But either way, there's a mountain of difference between £15,000 and £24000 which was my original point.
Lib Dems never promised to abolish tuition fees until 6 years in the future. It's just not do able in this economic climate
Good. I like tuition fees. Why on Earth should half of the population go to university, get drunk a lot, do very little work for 3 years and then get a good job each at the cost of thousands of pounds every year; whilst the other half of the population go straight into work???
To gerad09:
Why did you copy my post?
Policy- by - Policy:The coalition government's plans for universities!
Create more university places - but number not stipulated. Higher education funding policy awaits the outcome of a review by Lord Browne. Colleges to be "free" from direct state control. Abolish "many" further education quangos. Publish information on costs, graduate earnings and "student satisfaction" of university courses..........so wishy-washy!!!
what do you have to say about tht?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home